gt;
> Anyways – thank you so much for your help!
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Georg
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] *Im Auftrag von *Wolfgang Laun
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 2. August 20
atement?
Anyways - thank you so much for your help!
Best regards
Georg
Von: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von Wolfgang Laun
Gesendet: Montag, 2. August 2010 12:15
An: Rules Users List
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Drools + E
On 2 August 2010 12:14, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Several remarks:
> (1) Make sure that a parent is asserted after all of its children.
> Otherwise initial evaluation will not comprise the entire children's list.
>
What I meant is: after all children have been adder to the parent's list,
and *then*
Several remarks:
(1) Make sure that a parent is asserted after all of its children. Otherwise
initial evaluation will not comprise the entire children's list.
(2) After changing a child's state, update the parent.
(3) The rule as you have it now is somewhat circumstantial. A simpler
approach would
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out an issue for three days now and I'm getting kind of
desperate, so I hope someone can help.
I'm using Drools in combination with an EMF model which is modeling a
computer network. On init, I read the whole structure of the model and insert
all elements into the work
