RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-07-24 Thread raj_drools
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fenderbosch, Eric Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 11:46 AM To: Rules Users List Subject: RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling? We are having a similar problem, although our fact count is much higher. Performance seems pretty good and consistent until

Re: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-07-19 Thread Mark Proctor
To: Rules Users List Subject: RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling? FYI for the group. We seem to have solved our performance problem. I'll describe our problem space a bit some people have some context. We load up about 1200 Jobs with about 3000 Stops and about 1500 Vehicles

RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-07-09 Thread Fenderbosch, Eric
: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling? I am testing Drools 4 for our application and while sequential mode is very fast I get very poor scaling when I increase the number of facts for stateful or stateless sessions. I want to make sure I'm not doing something foolish before deciding

RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-07-09 Thread Anstis, Michael (M.)
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fenderbosch, Eric Sent: 09 July 2008 14:41 To: Rules Users List Subject: RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling? FYI for the group. We seem to have solved our performance problem. I'll describe our problem space a bit some people

RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-06-30 Thread Fenderbosch, Eric
those, but don't want to bother if this isn't a realistic solution. Any thoughts? Thanks Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Kneusel Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:47 PM To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Subject: [rules-users] Drools 4

Re: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-06-30 Thread Mark Proctor
@lists.jboss.org Subject: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling? I am testing Drools 4 for our application and while sequential mode is very fast I get very poor scaling when I increase the number of facts for stateful or stateless sessions. I want to make sure I'm not doing something foolish before

RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-06-30 Thread Ron Kneusel
) almost 5 seconds. Ron Subject: RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling? Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:46:15 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org We are having a similar problem, although our fact count is much higher

RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-06-30 Thread Fenderbosch, Eric
: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:47 PM To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Subject: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling? I am testing Drools 4 for our application and while sequential mode is very fast I get very poor scaling when I increase the number of facts for stateful or stateless

RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-06-30 Thread Ron Kneusel
: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling? I am testing Drools 4 for our application and while sequential mode is very fast I get very poor scaling when I increase the number of facts for stateful or stateless sessions. I want to make sure I'm not doing something foolish before

Re: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-06-27 Thread Mark Proctor
/wed. Ron Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:37:26 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling? Ron, Can you send me your project in zip, i'd be interesting to see this. Mark

[rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?

2008-06-26 Thread Ron Kneusel
I am testing Drools 4 for our application and while sequential mode is very fast I get very poor scaling when I increase the number of facts for stateful or stateless sessions. I want to make sure I'm not doing something foolish before deciding on whether or not to use Drools because from