Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-07-03 Thread Vignesh
Thanks a lot Prem, I will try using the steps you provided and get back to you in case of any issues. Thanks, Viki -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Execution-Server-and-Guvnor-tp933786p940776.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing lis

Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-07-03 Thread Esteban Aliverti
Guvnor exposes its resources (compiled or not) through urls. You can access those urls to get the rules, and add them to a kbase. If that it what you need, then you don't need execution server at all. Best, 2010/7/3 Premkumar Stephen > Hi Vignesh, > > Please read Mauricio's explanation above on

Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-07-03 Thread Premkumar Stephen
Hi Vignesh, Please read Mauricio's explanation above on when to use. In addition, this approach frees you up from using Drools from only java applications. For instance, we invoke the rules engine from Rails code. Basically, you need to do the following steps: 1) Create a xml or json in the pres

Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-07-02 Thread Vignesh
Hi Prem, I have tried the sample codes available to invoke a rule created in Guvnor/rules file directly and I am able to do it successfully and I had tried different stuffs over it. Currently what I am working on is, I need to invoke the rules via web service and return the values depending upon

Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-07-02 Thread Mauricio Salatino
Hi Vignesh, When you want to decouple the rules execution from your local JVM you need the server. If you want to run your rules in the same JVM that you application you don't need it. When you have a large amount of rules and sessions, you will probably prefer to use the server in order to decoupl

Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-07-02 Thread Premkumar Stephen
Vignesh, There is sample code available when you get the source code from the trunk. Is there a reason you are choosing the execution server, over directly invoking the rules? Regards, Prem On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Vignesh wrote: > > Can you please let me know the steps or provide som

Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-06-30 Thread Vignesh
Can you please let me know the steps or provide some more details on how to invoke a rule on Guvnor through execution server, which I am currently working on and it will be helpful to proceed further. Thanks, Viki -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.

Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-06-30 Thread Mauricio Salatino
If I don't remember wrong in that version you have the first version of drools-server that only host stateless sessions. Right now we are working in the second version of the drools execution server, and it will be ready (i think) for 5.1.CR1. On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Vignesh wrote: > >

Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-06-30 Thread Vignesh
Hi, I am using Drools 5.0.0 Thanks, Viki -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Execution-Server-and-Guvnor-tp933786p933904.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ r

Re: [rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-06-30 Thread Mauricio Salatino
Hi, which version of drools are you using? On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Vignesh wrote: > > Hi, > > I am new to Execution servers and I have created few rules in Guvnor, I > want > to invoke the rules via XML and validate the data which I want to process > through the execution server. Any de

[rules-users] Drools Execution Server and Guvnor

2010-06-30 Thread Vignesh
Hi, I am new to Execution servers and I have created few rules in Guvnor, I want to invoke the rules via XML and validate the data which I want to process through the execution server. Any detail/pointers on how to do this would be highly appreciated. Thanks, Viki -- View this message in contex