Op 18-02-13 16:34, Willem van Asperen schreef:
On 02/18/2013 02:35 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
Op 18-02-13 14:00, Willem van Asperen schreef:
On 02/18/2013 11:11 AM, Willem van Asperen wrote:
Hi All,
Just wanted to share with you an easy mistake. This is done running
Drools 5.5.0.Final.
On 02/18/2013 02:35 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
>
> Op 18-02-13 14:00, Willem van Asperen schreef:
>> On 02/18/2013 11:11 AM, Willem van Asperen wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Just wanted to share with you an easy mistake. This is done running
>>> Drools 5.5.0.Final.
>>>
>>> Imagine a fact
>>>
>>> |Che
Op 18-02-13 15:09, Wolfgang Laun schreef:
> On 18/02/2013, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
>> I think so too.
>> It looks like the : operator has a higher precedence then + (and
>> therefor >= too), which is a bit surprising indeed.
>> Personally, I never mix the : operator with other operators, to avoid
On 18/02/2013, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> I think so too.
> It looks like the : operator has a higher precedence then + (and
> therefor >= too), which is a bit surprising indeed.
> Personally, I never mix the : operator with other operators, to avoid
> having to worry about the precendence.
Is it
Op 18-02-13 14:00, Willem van Asperen schreef:
On 02/18/2013 11:11 AM, Willem van Asperen wrote:
Hi All,
Just wanted to share with you an easy mistake. This is done running
Drools 5.5.0.Final.
Imagine a fact
|Cheese (||
||creationTick : double||
||preservationTicks : double||
||)|
On 02/18/2013 11:11 AM, Willem van Asperen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just wanted to share with you an easy mistake. This is done running
> Drools 5.5.0.Final.
>
> Imagine a fact
>
> |Cheese (||
> ||creationTick : double||
> ||preservationTicks : double||
> ||)|
>
> Then the following does not do
Hi All,
Just wanted to share with you an easy mistake. This is done running
Drools 5.5.0.Final.
Imagine a fact
|Cheese (||
||creationTick : double||
||preservationTicks : double||
||)|
Then the following does not do what you expect:
|rule "dump old cheese"||
||when||
||$c :
