Yes there are plans to add this capability to guvnor. We are working on
drools-factconstraints that allows you to create validation rules for your
rules. The project is in a very early stage, but is usable now. Users can't
import custom rules yet, but you can add some basic restrictions to fields
d
I have just checked out the trunk version (5.1.0.SNAPSHOT) of Guvnor and
Verifier and am excited about the enhanced rule verification capabilities
introduced into Guvnor.
Are there any plans to allow customization such as allowing users to import
custom verification rules through Guvnor?
--
View
Hi,
The Verify button for a single asset will be in the asset editor, next
to the Validate button in the M2 release. The feature is in the trunk,
but it is/was down for a moment due to some updates.
You can use the verifier rules in M1 and earlier versions for the entire
rule package, if you g
I have just read http://community.jboss.org/wiki/DroolsVerifier and am happy
to see that Drools Verifier seems to be heading in the right direction for
business logic validation that my project requires.
Which version of Guvnor is the "Verify" button available in? I have
downloaded Guvnor 5.1.0.M
You can find a new "Verify" button when editing rules. This button makes use
of drools-verifier, which may be used to perform what you are trying to do.
We are working hard these days to add field and fact restrictions to guvnor.
You can check these links for more help:
ilesteban.wordpress.com/2010
Premkumar Stephen wrote:
>
> Currently, the validate functionality ensures that rules have proper
> syntax.
> it is possible to extend this functionality so that business use cases
> might
> also be validated? Is there an API/examples to do that.
>
I am also interested in having business logi
Hi,
This feature is not in the Guvnor at the moment, but I was planning to
add it when I start working on GUVNOR-101.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR-101
Toni
Premkumar Stephen wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Currently, the validate functionality ensures that rules have proper
> synta
Hello everyone,
Currently, the validate functionality ensures that rules have proper
syntax.
it is possible to extend this functionality so that business use cases might
also be validated? Is there an API/examples to do that.
For eg, in our domain, an object X can be evaluated for 3 criteria (
