Re: [rules-users] Facts with "from"

Thanks for the confirmation :-) Happy new year. Chris On 31/12/2010 15:14, Wolfgang Laun wrote: Hmm, you asked whether "do I take it that...", which I take to mean the same as "should I assume that...". Hence: yes, you should! Indirect figures of speech are always suprising if replied to at

Re: [rules-users] Facts with "from"

Hmm, you asked whether "do I take it that...", which I take to mean the same as "should I assume that...". Hence: yes, you should! Indirect figures of speech are always suprising if replied to at face value. Q. "May I ask you how olod you are?" A. "Yes, you may." WME = Working Memory Elements.

Re: [rules-users] Facts with "from"

I assume that you mean that Yes they don't rather than Yes they do :-) (Isn't english so imprecise?) (WMEs? Working Memory Entries?) Chris On 31/12/2010 12:55, Wolfgang Laun wrote: On 31 December 2010 11:33, Chris Selwyn > wrote: I am trying to unde

Re: [rules-users] Facts with "from"

On 31 December 2010 11:33, Chris Selwyn wrote: > I am trying to understand the usage of "from". > > Do I take it that facts that come from a "from" CE do not actually get > asserted into the WM? > Yes. (They might happen to be WMEs, if you have inserted them.) -W > > I would like to be sure be

[rules-users] Facts with "from"

I am trying to understand the usage of "from". Do I take it that facts that come from a "from" CE do not actually get asserted into the WM? I would like to be sure because the facts that I would like to fetch with "from" are actually the same Java class as one of my WM facts but I do not want