is the actual behavior?
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] En nombre de Wolfgang Laun
> Enviado el: dimarts, 10 / novembre / 2009 12:41
> Para: Rules Users List
> Asunto: Re: [rules-users] Inconsi
es this is working
> perfect... I know I have not giving so much input but I do not know what else
> could provide.
>
> Any clues ?
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] En nombre de Wolfgang Laun
ing
> perfect... I know I have not giving so much input but I do not know what else
> could provide.
>
> Any clues ?
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] En nombre de Wolfgang Laun
> Enviado el:
ss.org] En nombre de Wolfgang Laun
Enviado el: dilluns, 9 / novembre / 2009 13:56
Para: Rules Users List
Asunto: Re: [rules-users] Inconsistent behavior between LHS and RHS ...
It's difficult to assess this case without the code from Task.java,
especially mehtods getParameter(), getTechnicalP
It's difficult to assess this case without the code from Task.java,
especially mehtods getParameter(), getTechnicalParams(); the code used
to create the Task fact, and the actual output.
-W
2009/11/9 Javier Vera Gomez :
> Hi,
>
> I've been using drools 4.07 for a while. I have found a weird case.
Hi,
I've been using drools 4.07 for a while. I have found a weird case. It
seems that when evaluating the LHS some fact is true but the RHS probes
it wasn't actually true.
The example code is at the end. It is very weird to me I have no clue
about how to solve this or what could be happening!
