Usually a set of rules fires all rules when you call fireAllRules. So,
what's keeping you from collecting the solutions derived from the
fired rules and presenting them in some order to the user?
If the sequental addition or update of properties is interleaved with
calls to fireAllRules I'd attach
You might also try the new Belief System capabilities.. (JTMS and/or
Defeasible), see Mark's email/blog
about how to insert "negative" or "defeated" facts
On 09/23/2013 08:18 AM, Mauricio Salatino wrote:
> yeah you can do that, you can write rules about rules activations with
> the declarative ag
Could you post an example rule and some code that uses it? It'll make it
easier to understand what you're trying to achieve.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Indicating-used-rules-tp4026093p4026095.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum ma
yeah you can do that, you can write rules about rules activations with the
declarative agenda feature.
Check this out:
http://planet.jboss.org/post/declarative_agenda_and_control_rules
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Andrzej Grzelak wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Im making some kind of expert syste
Hello again,
Im making some kind of expert system. And now i got new problem:
User is asked sequentially for propetieries of object, than I modify object
propetieries, then i call update() and fireAllRules() to check for any
answers.
It is repeated for every object property till we fire rule with
