Re: [rules-users] Infinite loop when re-activating rules

2010-01-17 Thread Salaboy
Hi, you can add an extra restriction in C. That checks that the rules property is empty in the first rule, the second, the third, the fourth and the fifth will check the opposite. But the fifth rule will empty again the rules property making the first rule fire again. I think that you don't

[rules-users] Infinite loop when re-activating rules

2010-01-17 Thread orchid
Hi All, I have a question about avoiding infinite loop, not using 'no-loop' or 'lock-active' since I want to re-activate rules. Suppose I have one complex class C and a chain of rules in which Rule2 checks the result of Rule1, Rule 3 checks the result of rule 2, etc... In the last rule ("Rule5")