[mailto:
> rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Edson Tirelli
> *Sent:* 19 March 2009 16:06
> *To:* Rules Users List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Inserting a JRuby object via Spring
> JRubyScriptFactory in Drools
>
>
>Drools always looks for getters/setters
Mike
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: 19 March 2009 16:06
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Inserting a JRuby object via Spring
JRubyScriptFa
Drools always looks for getters/setters, never for the actual internal
attribute.
As long as you have an instance of a given interface and your rules are
written against the interface you should be fine in Drools 5.
Drools 4 used shadow facts, so, there would be more considerations to
ma
Hello Folks,
I have been looking at options of using ruby objects as fact objects in
Drool's working memory.
One obvious way is using services.
Another path that I have been researching about is to use Spring as outlined
here http://www.jroller.com/habuma/entry/spring_meet_ruby
Now, in this exam
