tablish what best practice for our domain ought to be.
>
>
>
> Peter.
>
>
>
> *From:* rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Anstis
> *Sent:* Thursday, 10 March 2011 10:45 a.m.
>
> *To:* Rules User
s once we’ve got our new system up and running. At this point
> I’m just trying to establish what best practice for our domain ought to be.
>
>
>
> Peter.
>
>
>
> *From:* rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Mic
I'm
just trying to establish what best practice for our domain ought to be.
Peter.
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Anstis
Sent: Thursday, 10 March 2011 10:45 a.m.
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-
ived from outside data, or used as output. As their name
> implies, they're used to explicitly control flow of the rules.
>
> --- On *Wed, 3/9/11, Peter Ashford * wrote:
>
>
> From: Peter Ashford
>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Misunderstanding salience?
> To: &q
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Swindells, Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, 9 March 2011 10:23 p.m.
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Misunderstanding salience? I don’t think you even
need it that complicated.Just have your constraints in the form Patient(advice
=
: Wednesday, 9 March 2011 10:23 p.m.
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Misunderstanding salience?
I don't think you even need it that complicated.
Just have your constraints in the form
Patient(advice == null, ...)
This assumes you only give the patient one advice at
2011 07:58
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Misunderstanding salience?
You had me fooled Peter, I thought you worked in a zombie related field ;-)
Control Facts can also be used, which I think David eluded to with his use of
"null advice", such that:-
rule "General
From:* rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *David Faulkner
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 9 March 2011 4:51 p.m.
>
> *To:* Rules Users List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Misunderstanding salience?
>
>
>
> Peter,
>
&g
what options are available and what's considered best practice.
Cheers!
Peter.
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of David Faulkner
Sent: Wednesday, 9 March 2011 4:51 p.m.
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rul
9, 2011 7:24 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Misunderstanding salience?
Actually, I think I've figured this one out : in the Zombie case, it's firing
both rules and it's just that with the negative salience, the zombie exception
rule is the last rule fired, there
-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] Misunderstanding salience?
Hi There
I'm new to drools. I've just set up the Drools-Server and it is (finally!)
working and serving my test rule-set. The one thing that's not working as I
expect it is the rule ordering via salienc
Hi There
I'm new to drools. I've just set up the Drools-Server and it is (finally!)
working and serving my test rule-set. The one thing that's not working as I
expect it is the rule ordering via salience. This is my simple test rule set:
rule "General brain eating advice"
when
12 matches
Mail list logo
