Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-26 Thread Mauricio Salatino
.InsertWorkItemHandler$1.insertFact(InsertWorkItemHandler.java:52) >>> at >>> com.test.InsertWorkItemHandler$1.run(InsertWorkItemHandler.java:40) >>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) >>> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: no

Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-26 Thread Esteban Aliverti
ransaction started on this >> thread >> at >> bitronix.tm.BitronixTransactionManager.rollback(BitronixTransactionManager.java:103) >> at >> org.drools.persistence.session.SingleSessionCommandService.execute(SingleSessionCommandService.java:278) >>

Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-26 Thread Pedro Maria Buitrago Mantilla
.InsertWorkItemHandler$1.run(InsertWorkItemHandler.java:40) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) >> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: no transaction started on this >> thread >> at >> bitronix.tm.BitronixTransactionManager.rollback(Bitr

Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-26 Thread Alan . Gairey
l system may be monitored and stored in an information retrieval system. rudolf michael Sent by: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org 26/04/2010 15:05 Please respond to Rules Users List To Rules Users List cc Subject Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items Alan, couldn't yo

Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-26 Thread rudolf michael
sactionManager.rollback(BitronixTransactionManager.java:103) > at > org.drools.persistence.session.SingleSessionCommandService.execute(SingleSessionCommandService.java:278) > ... 4 more > > Any help anyone can provide would be very much appreciated. Thank you. > > Re

Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-23 Thread Pedro Maria Buitrago Mantilla
Each of the sub flows requires final user design. Mauricio thanks very much. PEDRO BUITRAGO Bogotá, Colombia 2010/4/22 Mauricio Salatino > yes.. sounds more like a normal java problem than Drools FLow problem. I > think that your solution is the correct one because it handle internally the >

Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-22 Thread Mauricio Salatino
yes.. sounds more like a normal java problem than Drools FLow problem. I think that your solution is the correct one because it handle internally the multithreaded requierements and then it continue the business process normally. 2010/4/22 Pedro Maria Buitrago Mantilla > The idea is to run mult

Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-22 Thread Pedro Maria Buitrago Mantilla
The idea is to run multiple independent sub flows. Each of the sub flows requires approximately 2 minutes to complete, so parallel processing is required. Once all the sub flows have completed their tasks is necessary to collect all the results and process them. This implies that the workflow shoul

Re: [rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-22 Thread Mauricio Salatino
can you describe a little bit your use case? I'm not sure about what you want to achieve. 2010/4/21 Pedro Maria Buitrago Mantilla > In general, I meet that for resolve the topic of multithreading it's > required to implement another thread over a work item. > > How does the asynchronic task can

[rules-users] Multithreading work items

2010-04-21 Thread Pedro Maria Buitrago Mantilla
In general, I meet that for resolve the topic of multithreading it's required to implement another thread over a work item. How does the asynchronic task can modified a variable of Knowledgebase? Can you give me an example? Pedro Buitrago ___ rules-us