Lol, I guess I need a cup of coffee.
Yes, that was what I meant.
Edson
2011/10/7 Michael Anstis
> Edson, you mean 5.3.Final?
>
> sent on the move
>
> On 7 Oct 2011 21:08, "Edson Tirelli" wrote:
>
>>
>>This is fixed in master. Will be in 3.1 final release.
>>
>>Edson
>>
>> 201
Edson, you mean 5.3.Final?
sent on the move
On 7 Oct 2011 21:08, "Edson Tirelli" wrote:
>
>This is fixed in master. Will be in 3.1 final release.
>
>Edson
>
> 2011/10/7 mike9322
>
>>
>> laune wrote:
>> >
>> > There's a bug in the incremental build as done by the KnowledgeAgent. If
>> >
This is fixed in master. Will be in 3.1 final release.
Edson
2011/10/7 mike9322
>
> laune wrote:
> >
> > There's a bug in the incremental build as done by the KnowledgeAgent. If
> > the
> > KA configuration property drools.agent.newInstance is set to false, some
> > type information is no
laune wrote:
>
> There's a bug in the incremental build as done by the KnowledgeAgent. If
> the
> KA configuration property drools.agent.newInstance is set to false, some
> type information is not put into the new KBase.
>
I added the following comment to the JIRA related to this issue
(https:/
On 13 July 2011 17:09, John wrote:
> Interesting... I have no idea why the KnowledgeBuilder would compile the
> DRL
> differently than the KnowledgeAgent,
There's a bug in the incremental build as done by the KnowledgeAgent. If the
KA configuration property drools.agent.newInstance is set to fa
On 13 July 2011 17:09, John wrote:
> Interesting... I have no idea why the KnowledgeBuilder would compile the
> DRL
> differently than the KnowledgeAgent, but I don't think I had this problem
> in
> 5.1.1.
Yes, it's OK in 5.1.1; I've verified this with my simplified setup using
file: rather tha
Interesting... I have no idea why the KnowledgeBuilder would compile the DRL
differently than the KnowledgeAgent, but I don't think I had this problem in
5.1.1. I'm up and running now with the type fully declared in DRL and I can
live with that. Thanks for looking into this.
--
View this message
If the event type is fully declared in DRL, the NPE does not occur.
What is the difference between DRL being compiled in the course of a
ChangeSet in contrast to being compiled by a KnowledgeBuilder?
-W
On 13 July 2011 15:05, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that this is a bug. When co
I'm pretty sure that this is a bug. When compiling a DRL from a Chenge Set,
the resulting package
in the Knowledge Base does not contain declare'd types that do not contain
fields; it only contains declares with at least one field.
This results in a ClassObjectTypeConf with a typeDecl == null, and
Hello,
I've been messing with this for days now and can't get to the bottom of
this. I'm using drools 5.2.0 Final and setting up my KnowledgeBase with a
KnowledgeAgent which is pulling a package from guvnor (also 5.2.0 Final). I
do NOT get this error if I use a KnowledgeBuilder and add the exact
10 matches
Mail list logo