ules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] NPE on retract
I'll try to create a self contained test. It may be a difficult
task. The error seems to come and go depending on which other rules I
leave in my rule set. In particular, there is another rule that has
many
Chris,
My misunderstanding was that Drools used object identity with an
IdentifyHashMap unless it was configured to use a regular HashMap. Is this
not the case?
Yes, it uses identity as default for regular assertions, but at the same
time, it uses equality for the Truth Management System (
I'll try to create a self contained test. It may be a difficult task. The
error seems to come and go depending on which other rules I leave in my rule
set. In particular, there is another rule that has many conditions and only
logs a message as the consequence that when it is included in the rul
Chris
Can you provide a self contained test that shows the problem and open a
JIRA with it?
I will take a look in it.
There is no requirement to define equals/hashcode, but if you do so, you
need to make them time consistent, i.e., they cannot change during the time
the object is asserte
Mark,
The object being retracted currently has no hashcode and equals, therefore
defaulting to the ones on Object. The reason I'm even retracting the object
is so that I can assert it again to work around bug
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-614. Therefore the reason I am
retracting th
Have you correctly implemented your equals and hashcode? Have you made
sure that the objects fields haven't changed between the assert and the
retract?
Mark
Chris West wrote:
Hi,
Using version 3.0.6 of jboss rules, while retracting an object, I get
the following:
java.lang.NullPointerExce
Hi,
Using version 3.0.6 of jboss rules, while retracting an object, I get the
following:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.drools.reteoo.beta.InstanceEqualConstrRightMemory.remove(Unknown
Source)
at org.drools.reteoo.BetaMemory.remove (Unknown Source)
at org.drools.reteoo.NotNode.re
