ation on the increase) is most welcome
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:42:47 -0700
> From: dso...@gmail.com
> To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Package footprint
>
> I agree with Wolfgang... can you give us an idea of the rules you are working
> w
I agree with Wolfgang... can you give us an idea of the rules you are working
with?
Actually:
- using shorter names might be a last-resort, unless you were using really
long names in the first place
- do not use redundant code is a good practice anyway!
- agreed, evals are evils :)
- changing the D
Most of these "optimizations" look very desparate to me; most likely
they are motivated by a very large number of rules. Perhaps some
techniques for reducing this number would show greater benefit.
-W
On 13/09/2012, JP Chemali wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to reduce the memory footprint of pac
Hi all,
I'm trying to reduce the memory footprint of packages in my application (for
performance reasons they are dynamically loaded from disk), and I was
wondering if some of you had any experience with the subject?
So far the optimizations that I can come up with in 5.4.0.Final version are
all
