e and trouble!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Persistence-in-fireUntilHalt-loop-tp3809352p4019838.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
Sure!
Drools does JPA persistence using this set of managers:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-persistence-jpa/src/main/java/org/drools/persistence/jpa/JpaPersistenceContextManager.java
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-persistence-jpa/src/main/java/
Sorry, to be clear: a github link to the code you quoted is what I
was after.
03/19/2012 10:33 PM, Marco Rietveld:
Alberto,
Sorry to hear that the bug isn't fixed.
Could you clarify what you mean by these points?
- Dro
Alberto,
Sorry to hear that the bug isn't fixed.
Could you clarify what you mean by these points?
- Drools and JBPM have different persistence managers.
- Drools uses JTA for persistence and JBPM does not.
I was pretty sure you could specify a
I'm afraid this bug is not resolved and doesn't have nothing to do with
lazy evaluation.
We've been able to get to the source of the problem and this are the facts:
- Drools and JBPM have different persistence managers.
- Drools uses JTA for persistence and JBPM does not.
- When any JPA
Great news!
We were in the process of debugging JBPM trying to find the source of the
bug ... and maybe days away from the solution ...
Is there any bug report in Jira and/or a patch we can apply without having
to wait for the next release so we can quick-patch our systems?
Alberto R. Galdo
arg
Hi Alberto,
This is a bug that has been fixed in jBPM. It had to do with lazy
initialization of a JPAProcessInstanceManager
field.
We'll be releasing a new jBPM version sometime soon (synchronous
with Drools, I think). The bug is fixed in there.
it should work, if it doesn't then it seems like a bug. We are gearing
up for release 5.4 now, so might be a while before we can address this.
Unless there is a pull request with a suggested fix :)
Mark
On 08/03/2012 10:32, Alberto R. Galdo wrote:
Hi,
We're running an application that uses
Any info on the subject?
Does anyone suffers the same problem?
Anyone doing persistence on a fireUnitHalt loop?
Alberto R. Galdo
arga...@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:32, Alberto R. Galdo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're running an application that uses Drools + JBPM 5 + Drools
> integration o
Hi,
We're running an application that uses Drools + JBPM 5 + Drools
integration our set-up can be seen as:
Some rule fires and creates a JBPM process ( a fact gets inserted into
drools using "kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime().startProcess("testProcess")"
). We have a problem with the persistence
10 matches
Mail list logo
