me too i have the same problem and I hope that drools 5.3.CR1 will release
very soon
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Persistence-of-events-tp61237p3359145.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
On 22/09/2011 09:32, awuttke wrote:
> Any update on this? I'm also planning to use Drools CEP on facts and events
> that should be persisted into a DB.
Events are now marshallable. This is fixed in master HEAD, you'll be
able to try it out in 5.3.CR1 out this week.
Mark
>
> --
> View this message
Any update on this? I'm also planning to use Drools CEP on facts and events
that should be persisted into a DB.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Persistence-of-events-tp61237p3358064.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Hello,
Is it possible to persist events (from drools fusion) with default jpa
mechanism? When I try to do this 'just like that' I get exception
like
org.drools.common.DefaultFactHandle incompatible with
org.drools.common.EventFactHandle
It seems that session marshaller is not really aware of ce
