Re: [rules-users] Problem with CommandFactory.newStartProcess in 5.2 M1

2011-03-30 Thread Wolfgang Laun
Daniel, the code you are showing is one layer removed from the actual implementation Mauricio has been showing. The call in CommandFactory: getCommandFactoryProvider() fetches the actual implementation, i.e., a CommandFactoryServiceImpl object. HTH -W 2011/3/29 Seaver, Daniel (GE Healthcare)

Re: [rules-users] Problem with CommandFactory.newStartProcess in 5.2 M1

2011-03-29 Thread Seaver, Daniel (GE Healthcare)
Ok, I finally got setup to use git and look at the latest drools code. In that repository, the code for CommandFactory.newStartProcess looks like this: public static Command newStartProcess(String processId, MapString, Object parameters) {

[rules-users] Problem with CommandFactory.newStartProcess in 5.2 M1

2011-03-16 Thread Seaver, Daniel (GE Healthcare)
There appears to be a problem with CommandFactory.newStartProcess in Drools 5.2 M1. If I do this: String someString = Some String; MapString, Object variables = new HashMapString, Object(); variables.put(someString, someString); ListCommand?

Re: [rules-users] Problem with CommandFactory.newStartProcess in 5.2 M1

2011-03-16 Thread Mauricio Salatino
That's weird, I'm looking at the master repository and that's exactly what the newStartProcess do: public Command newStartProcess(String processId, MapString, Object parameters) { StartProcessCommand startProcess = new StartProcessCommand(); startProcess.setProcessId(processId);

Re: [rules-users] Problem with CommandFactory.newStartProcess in 5.2 M1

2011-03-16 Thread Mauricio Salatino
. Take a look at CmdStyleRuleFlowTest.java. *Dan* *From:* Mauricio Salatino [mailto:sala...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, March 16, 2011 4:28 PM *To:* Rules Users List *Cc:* Seaver, Daniel (GE Healthcare) *Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Problem with CommandFactory.newStartProcess in 5.2 M1