Re: [rules-users] RegEx in LHS

2007-11-28 Thread Markus Helbig
ok thanks ... Markus 2007/11/28, Edson Tirelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >Markus, > >The engine processes the mappings in the order they are written, so you > must always write more restrictive patterns first and less restrictive > patterns second: > > [condition][]Title contains not {value}

Re: [rules-users] RegEx in LHS

2007-11-28 Thread Edson Tirelli
Markus, The engine processes the mappings in the order they are written, so you must always write more restrictive patterns first and less restrictive patterns second: [condition][]Title contains not {value}=title not matches {value} [condition][]Title contains {value}=title matches {value}

[rules-users] RegEx in LHS

2007-11-28 Thread Markus Helbig
Hi all, i'd like to have following DSL conditions [condition][]Title contains {value}=title matches {value} [condition][]Title contains not {value}=title not matches {value} Currently (using Drools 4.0.3) it seems the parsers resolves to the first condtion and is matching the word "not" to {val