Here the situtation in my application (small sample application works,
i checked that, so up to 99% there's a fault in my implementation but
currently i'm stuck, maybe someone has an idea what can be wrong):
-> startProcess results in 2 Activations
-> first: Fact 1 and Fact 2 on rulenode1
-> seco
i'll try to make a simple example and send it, currently i found a dirty hack.
Cheers
Markus
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Kris Verlaenen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it seems the activation for the second node is not cancelled also i
>> do a retract in the rule
>
> The activation should hav
it seems the activation for the second node is not cancelled also i
do a retract in the rule
The activation should have been removed from the ruleflow group. I just
tested this with a small example and I do not seem to be able to reproduce
this error, the retracted object seems to have resulted
Hi,
one question about using ruleflows:
1. i have a ruleflow consisting of 2 Nodes
2. i insert 2 facts
3. the 2 facts match the condition in rule for the second node, so
when inserting an activation is generated
4. but the rule in the first node will retract one of the 2 facts
5. it seems the act
