Re: [rules-users] Salience problems

2011-04-29 Thread Chris Selwyn
Thanks very much Wolfgang... that appears to fix it. Chris On 28/04/2011 06:51, Wolfgang Laun wrote: This has indeed been discovered recently, for certain scenarios where activations were queued in the wrong order after fact modification. The fix is in

[rules-users] Salience problems

2011-04-27 Thread Chris Selwyn
I am finding that the salience feature is acting very erratically. Some of my rules modify the working memory. So I would like them to execute before the others that simply read the memory after modification and report on certain data conditions that are left after all modifications have

Re: [rules-users] Salience problems

2011-04-27 Thread Tihomir Surdilovic
Hi Chris, since you mention to already have a support license for JBoss Enterprise BRMS, the best place to ask these types of questions is at the excellent JBoss Customer Support Portal (https://access.redhat.com/home) where your question will be handled under SLAs ensuring timely response and

Re: [rules-users] Salience problems

2011-04-27 Thread Wolfgang Laun
This has indeed been discovered recently, for certain scenarios where activations were queued in the wrong order after fact modification. The fix is in ./drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/core/util/BinaryHeapQueue.java: --- a/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/core/util/BinaryHeapQueue.java