I am in a very similar situation. We all know that the number of facts + the
way the rule was written / optimized can greatly affect memmory consumption.
But there has to be some number we could throw out where it most situations
that number for heap allocation is feasible. By the way, the reason
No formula is possible as this depends on the number and structure of your
rules and patterns.
Not too long ago there was a thread where a guy reported savings amounting
to orders of magnitude after following good advice, by avoiding Cartesian
products.
-W
2010/8/3 Nick Heudecker
> I'm workin
I'm working on some capacity planning and I need an accurate way to
determine the size of the working memory. Any suggestions on getting
visibility into the size of the WM?
Thanks.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.j