i tried with
ProcessResult( $id1 : id,... )
ProcessResult( id > $id1,...)
by having an id in my ProcessResult. It still does not work. :-( it takes
forever to insert records.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Strange-Performance-Proble
On 19 October 2010 15:02, ravibhatt wrote:
>
> Thomas,
>
> For testing purposes, i am inserting only 5 rules, 2 ProcessResult Objects
> and 2 ProcessData Objects.
>
With two ProcessResult objects, this
$processResult1:ProcessResult( inputSource == "table1",... )
$processResult2:ProcessRes
Thomas,
For testing purposes, i am inserting only 5 rules, 2 ProcessResult Objects
and 2 ProcessData Objects.
When i use a rule that does not use hardcoded "table1", it inserts first
1 ProcessData objects fairly quickly, for next 1 it is taking
forever. Like in 30 mins its able to i
of
rule.inputSource.
Thomas
> -Original Message-
> From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-
> boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of ravibhatt
> Sent: 19 October 2010 13:24
> To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Strange Performa
Hi Wolfgang Laun-2,
i continue to have problems with performance of this rule.
I made few more observations:
if i write the rule like this (notice hardcoded tbale name in input source
comparision), it runs fast.
$project:Project(status==Status.DATA_FETCHED)
$rule:Rule(
it turns out that inputSource memberOf $rule.inputTableList is the problem.
My Rule contains a list of input tables, and if i use inputSource ==
"tablename"; this works much much faster.
is there any other way to check if one objects value is in other object? And
because of the order of object
Thanks for your prompt reply.
Even if i remove those extra conditions it still takes a lot of time given
the fact that i have only 2 facts.
my getValue() maintains a hashmap and it returns values from the map. So it
should be fast. I tried removing equalsIgnoreCase and its still the same.
One simple observation:
$processResult2 : ProcessResult(...
inputSource != $processResult1.inputSource,
this != $processresult1,... )
The test using this is redundant, since different inputSource implies
that the containing object is not identical.
Anothe
Hi all,
I have a rule that looks like below:
Rule "CheckSomeConditionRule"
When
$project:Project(status==STATUS_ENUM.DATA_FETCHED)
$rule:Rule(name=="CheckSomeConditionRule")
$processResult1:ProcessResult(projectId==$project.id, inputSource memberOf
$rule.inputTableList
,
