Re: [rules-users] Temporal operators for point-in-time events

2011-12-13 Thread Edson Tirelli
Good catch. The diagram is wrong. It should be as it is stated in the documentation. Edson On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Mike Melton wrote: > Thank you, Edson. > > I saw the written documentation but since the default after interval > is [1ms, infinity], I wanted to check for the spe

Re: [rules-users] Temporal operators for point-in-time events

2011-12-13 Thread Mike Melton
Thank you, Edson. I saw the written documentation but since the default after interval is [1ms, infinity], I wanted to check for the specific [0, infinity] case that there wasn't a better suited operator. I do have a (somewhat related) question about the documentation when compared to the diagram

Re: [rules-users] Temporal operators for point-in-time events

2011-12-13 Thread Edson Tirelli
Your use of the after operator is correct. The documentation tells you about that, although in textual form: http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.3.0.Final/drools-fusion-docs/html_single/index.html#d0e611 This presentation has the 2 tables of operators: http://www.slideshare.net/ge0ffrey

[rules-users] Temporal operators for point-in-time events

2011-12-13 Thread Mike Melton
Apologies for the stupid question, but I haven't seen anything in the documentation regarding this and I want to verify my solution. Say I have a point-in-time event (i.e., duration of 0) that I want to correlate to another point-in-time event. I want a rule that will activate if the timestamp of o