On 08/04/2013 10:05 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> The rule is correct, and it works with similar scenarios.There may be
> a bug, due to circumstances. Can you post a simple but complete set of
> files to reproduce this?
>
You're perfectly right :-) The rule was correct, but as I wrote in an
earlier po
The rule is correct, and it works with similar scenarios.There may be
a bug, due to circumstances. Can you post a simple but complete set of
files to reproduce this?
-W
On 03/08/2013, Joe Ammann wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm still struggling with the handling of lists and membership in the
> LHS of ru
Sorry, the actual error in my logic was totally unrelated to the
fragment below.
The problem was that the DQAttribute that should have matched below was
inserted by another rule, but the insertion was done at a time when the
checkViolations collection was still emtpy. And I had forgotten the
modif
Hi all
I'm still struggling with the handling of lists and membership in the
LHS of rule. I'm trying to formulate a rule that only fires if a certain
object is not yet a member of a list.
Here's what I currently have (Drools 5.5.0 btw):
rule "R2030: UpdateDQAttribute"
dialect "mvel"
Yes, I was just wondering if I could use a pattern binding variable
instead of a pattern. I guess I cannot. David
David R Robison
Open Roads Consulting, Inc.
103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320
phone: (757) 546-3401
e-mail: drrobi...@openroadsconsulting.com
web: http://openroadsconsulting.com
b
There's a minor problem with the syntax
On 19/02/2013, Stephen Masters wrote:
> Assuming that you don't have an infinite variety of accumulations you're
> trying to use, something I have done previously is to create DRL technical
> rule to generate accumulated values, which the DSL then uses as
>
Assuming that you don't have an infinite variety of accumulations you're trying
to use, something I have done previously is to create DRL technical rule to
generate accumulated values, which the DSL then uses as constraints.
i.e.
rule "Generate sensor counts"
when
$sensor : Sensor()
What (I think) you are trying to do is not possible.
But I wouldn't say that it cannot be done using DSL. What sort of
collect/accumulate do you need?
-W
On 18/02/2013, David R Robison wrote:
> I am developing rules using DSL so, from what I understand, I cannot use
> collect and accumulate in
I am developing rules using DSL so, from what I understand, I cannot use
collect and accumulate in some of my DSL definitions (especially when
using clauses that begin with a hyphen). So what I want to do is to test
the count of a pattern binding variable, such as
when
$sensors : Sensor()
I tried that but it seems that setting a global on a Stateless session simply
sets a value in a Map without doing any validation, hence no Exception.
What I am doing now is to set the value in the Stateless session. It seems that
those variables are made available to the StatefulSession that sls
But you can
try{ ks.setGlobal(...) } catch( Exception e ){ }
-W
On 14/02/2012, Chris Selwyn wrote:
> Is there a way to test for the existence of a global variable in a
> StatelessKnowledgeSession before inserting a SetGlobal command into a
> BatchExecutionCommand?
>
> I am trying to write a r
Is there a way to test for the existence of a global variable in a
StatelessKnowledgeSession before inserting a SetGlobal command into a
BatchExecutionCommand?
I am trying to write a rules executor class that may execute some rulesets that
need a particular global variable and some that don't.
Hi,
I've written code that converts our company's internal model of a process
flow to a Drools flow, using the fluent API. I can see in my debugger that
I've created the correct structure (I think), but I'd like to write test
cases that prove it. Is there a way to check the structure of the gene
Hello,
My emails stopped getting through from my other emal address and as some
other users had helped me discover, the filtering/spam or whatever has
prevented me from asking questions in the forumn, so I am testing from
another email.
Thanks,
Chris
__
fire on fact B?
>
> You can even go down to the level of "did rule sequence A fire in
> the right order?" assertions, but usually such tests are too
> brittle, and miss the point of rules anyway. :)
>
> --- On Wed, 12/2/09, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
>> From: Asi
gt;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org]
> On Behalf Of
> Pegram, Macon
>
> Sent: 02
> December 2009 16:08
>
> To: Rules
> Users List
>
>
Thanks will look into it.
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Pegram, Macon
Sent: 02 December 2009 16:08
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Testing individual rules
Yes...
We've u
sday, December 02, 2009 6:59 AM
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject: [rules-users] Testing individual rules
Hi,
This is general question, is it possible to test individual rules in a
rules file? And using what, I am familiar with JUnit, but have seen Fit
being used
Hi,
This is general question, is it possible to test individual rules in a rules
file? And using what, I am familiar with JUnit, but have seen Fit being used in
examples.
regards
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.j
Hi,
I'm wondering if I am doing something wrong in my code:
I create dummy type declarations to indicate presence of certain
states (is there possibly a better way of doing this?):
declare Domestic
dummy : boolean
end
declare Multiple
dummy : boolean
end
rule "..."
when
...
20 matches
Mail list logo
