Re: [rules-users] This (ordered) record validation approach is working

2011-12-08 Thread Swindells, Thomas
Is this presentation available anywhere? > -Original Message- > From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users- > boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun > Sent: 08 December 2011 07:13 > To: Rules Users List > Subject: Re: [rules-users] Thi

Re: [rules-users] This (ordered) record validation approach is working

2011-12-07 Thread Wolfgang Laun
In my Rules Fest 2011 boot camp "Rule-Based Programming Design Patterns" I presented a generic solution using linked rule engines for this and similar problems. -W On 08/12/2011, ronalbury wrote: > I didn't get any feedback when I posted earlier today, so I went ahead and > implemented what I th

[rules-users] This (ordered) record validation approach is working

2011-12-07 Thread ronalbury
I didn't get any feedback when I posted earlier today, so I went ahead and implemented what I thought would work ... and I figured I should share it here since it seems to be working pretty well. I created a Rule Flow as follows: A Rule-Flow-Group that validates the arrays. Unfortunately I som