Re: [rules-users] TimerService vs TimeMachine and date-effective

2011-06-07 Thread Mark Proctor
On 07/06/2011 21:35, David Goldstein wrote: > Mark, > > Thanks. Based upon your discussion and the manuals, I was looking for > the Quartz jars but haven't been seeing them. Are they bundled? From > the org.drools.runtime I am wondering if I should be instead > implemeting org,drools.runtime.Cal

Re: [rules-users] TimerService vs TimeMachine and date-effective

2011-06-01 Thread Mark Proctor
On 01/06/2011 21:37, drdaveg wrote: > A common issue that I am looking into is setting the execution date to test > future or legacy rules (i.e., with dates that are not the system date.) A > number of users have posted about TimeMachine, TimeServices and the perils > of setting the system date -

[rules-users] TimerService vs TimeMachine and date-effective

2011-06-01 Thread drdaveg
A common issue that I am looking into is setting the execution date to test future or legacy rules (i.e., with dates that are not the system date.) A number of users have posted about TimeMachine, TimeServices and the perils of setting the system date - but a JIRA lists TimeMachine as being remove