On 19/04/2011 18:58, Vincent LEGENDRE wrote:
Hi All
First : sorry for the misplaced reply to another thread
This post is to continue an interresting (to me) discussion started
there : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-46
This was about my remark about a backward-chaining mode that could
Hi All
First : sorry for the misplaced reply to another thread
This post is to continue an interresting (to me) discussion started there :
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-46
This was about my remark about a backward-chaining mode that could be used to
allow sequential mode to handle
Hi All
This post is to continue an interresting (to me) discussion started there :
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-46
This was about my remark about a backward-chaining mode that could be used to
allow sequential mode to handle some kind of RETE updates (first rules could
then trigge
Torfox wrote:
Mark Proctor wrote:
It seems I have misunderstood the documentation- the sequential mode
(https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/docs/drools-expert/html_single/index.html#d0e1809)
3.3.7.1:
"Order the Rules by salience and pos
Mark Proctor wrote:
>
>
>> It seems I have misunderstood the documentation- the sequential mode
>> (https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/docs/drools-expert/html_single/index.html#d0e1809)
>> 3.3.7.1:
>>
>> "Order the Rules by salience and positi
Torfox wrote:
Ross H wrote:
You might need to think about how the rules engine does it job. The first
part is setting up the network to match your conditions, the second is
then
executing the consequences of those matched facts.
What your seeing here is the first part finding nulls. So you
Ross H wrote:
>
> You might need to think about how the rules engine does it job. The first
> part is setting up the network to match your conditions, the second is
> then
> executing the consequences of those matched facts.
>
> What your seeing here is the first part finding nulls. So you nee
You might need to think about how the rules engine does it job. The first
part is setting up the network to match your conditions, the second is then
executing the consequences of those matched facts.
What your seeing here is the first part finding nulls. So you need to make
sure that all your fac
The Params object is a fact of declared type. A basic iniotiation is
performed in rule1, but the rule1 is not fired in the first place.
adding another condition that checks policy.params != null in condition of
rule 2 is not solving my problem that refers to rules ordering algorithm. I
have hund
I don't see the initialisation of fields modelGroup and region in the Params
fact. They aren't int, but Integer, and so not zero by default.
-W
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Torfox wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I couldn't find an solution to a problem I'm struggling with for many hours.
>
> Generally I'm
Try adding another condition that checks policy.params != null in your
customer condition of rule 2
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Torfox wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I couldn't find an solution to a problem I'm struggling with for many
> hours.
>
> Generally I'm trying to implement sequential mode rules
Hi,
I couldn't find an solution to a problem I'm struggling with for many hours.
Generally I'm trying to implement sequential mode rules. I have applied
salience parameters to order the rules, but the engine is not executing
these rules in that order.
I use drools 5.0.1 in sequential mode, s
Hi All,
I am trying to figure out when to use Sequential Mode.
Also, what does SequentailAgenda.SEQUENTIAL and SequentialAgenda.DYNAMIC
means.
rule "asset > 1000"
when
s : Security( status == "NOT VALIDATED", country == "USA", asset
> 1000)
then
s.setStatus("VALIDATED");
Hi ,
i'm using Drools4.0.7 .
For improving performance of my rule engine ,i want to go for Sequential
mode .
i want to know whether sequential mode supports Rule Flow .
if yes how can i do that ?
thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Sequential-mode-supports
Thats a mistake, I'll correct it now. If you try it sequential mode
blows up the engine in statefulsession.
Mark
ekke wrote:
in the docs I read:
2.5.6 ... StatelessSession supports sequential mode...
2.5.10 ... Sequential mode can only be used with a StatefulSession
so whats true ?
thx for in
in the docs I read:
2.5.6 ... StatelessSession supports sequential mode...
2.5.10 ... Sequential mode can only be used with a StatefulSession
so whats true ?
thx for info
ekke
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sequential-mode-tf4513876.html#a12874505
Sent from the drools
16 matches
Mail list logo
