Re: [rules-users] Reasoning with past events

2010-11-15 Thread Wolfgang Laun
On 15 November 2010 11:56, Anais Martinez amarti...@iti.upv.es wrote: I'm using Drools for a system of alarms on agriculture. I am considering several parcels, whose plants can be on different status (for example, sprouting, flowering, etc.). These statuses are updated automatically by

Re: [rules-users] Reasoning with past events

2010-11-15 Thread Anais Martinez
The system is receiving readings from real sensors of humidity, temperature, etc.. There are a lot of rules for deciding if a specific plague or illness affects (or can affect) to the plants or not: One condition of those rules is the plants' status, because the illnesses affect to the plant

Re: [rules-users] Reasoning with past events

2010-11-15 Thread Wolfgang Laun
I think that a parcel (a field) needs to be a static fact, perhaps not maintaining a single state but two states, previous and current. Events are state changes and sensor readings. Now, if sensor readings are dangerous for state A and if the last state change is not much distant from the sensor

Re: [rules-users] Reasoning with past events

2010-11-15 Thread Anais Martinez
Well, I'm in a dead end with my model, so I'm going to consider your idea. I think it is best solution. Thanks again. -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Reasoning-with-past-events-tp1903815p1904505.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list