Re: [rules-users] modifying the problem facts while running the solver - Drools Planner

2012-08-13 Thread ge0ffrey
spinjala wrote > > I am new to Drools planner. I have one issue and wanted to understand how > to resolve it best. > > I am trying to use planner to optimize the scheduling of work orders to > resources. I have certain resources that need to be assigned to a work > order in a way that maximizes

Re: [rules-users] modifying the problem facts while running the solver - Drools Planner

2012-08-15 Thread Garf
spinjala wrote > > 1) When a solution violates all constraints, does it provide a default > solution? If so, can it be changed so that it doesn't provide one? > Otherwise, is there a way to assure that no solution is generated when ALL > constraints are violated. > Let's walk through the code.

Re: [rules-users] modifying the problem facts while running the solver - Drools Planner

2012-08-15 Thread Garf
spinjala wrote > > I tried setting the scoreAttained and maximum time allowed to spend in my > termination configuration, but none seems to stop the solver finding the > solution that violates ALL constraints and hence throws a negative hard > score. Is this the only way to do it or any other wa

Re: [rules-users] modifying the problem facts while running the solver - Drools Planner

2012-08-17 Thread Garf
spinjala wrote > > THis is what is happening now with my sample solution that I am writing.. > Once the solver finds that a workorder (WO1) couldn't be assigned to any > resource in the list of resources (due to the constraints)... Well, it's a slightly different problem them. Planner's approach

Re: [rules-users] modifying the problem facts while running the solver - Drools Planner

2012-08-20 Thread ge0ffrey
spinjala wrote > > Once the solver finds that a workorder (WO1) couldn't be assigned to any > resource in the list of resources (due to the constraints), it simply > picks up the 1st resource in the list with highest hard score and assigns > it (even though this assignment breaks all constraints)

Re: [rules-users] modifying the problem facts while running the solver - Drools Planner

2012-08-20 Thread ge0ffrey
typo: Planner perceives an planning variable with the planning value *null* as being "uninitialized", not as "unassigned". This is due to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3317 -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/modifying-the-problem-facts-while-running-t