Full source code:
extern mod std;
extern mod extra;
use std::{task, io};
use extra::flatpipes;
fn main() {
let (port, chan) = flatpipes::serial::pipe_stream();
do task::spawn || {
let value = @[1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
chan.send(value)
}
let val = port.recv();
io::print
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Bennie Kloosteman wrote:
> "You think Linux is not well-engineered?"
>
> Nope .. its the same piece of 1970s crap that all the other popular OS use ,
> with trivial differences people make a bit deal about.. You really think the
> difference between Vista and Linux
If anyone other Rust folks are also going to be at Lambda Jam Chicago this
week, we should get a beer or something and hang out! I've just gotten
into town. :)
Kevin
___
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust
I'm having difficulty compiling even the first sample. Nothing I do can
convince my rust 0.7 compiler of the existence of flatpipes... but I'm new
to this whole thing anyways.
The one thing that jumps out at me: should the second example have "||"
after the word 'spawn' in the do statement? i.e. d
>From what I gather, you only really use Windows... yet you're trying to
argue about Unix-like systems. They are not even similar to Windows at all,
so your attempt to argue that in fact they're all the same is amusing...
and saddening. I didn't switch away from Windows because I grew a neckbeard
o
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Bennie Kloosteman wrote:
> "You think Linux is not well-engineered?"
>
> Nope .. its the same piece of 1970s crap that all the other popular OS use ,
> with trivial differences people make a bit deal about.. You really think the
> difference between Vista and Linux
I wasn't aware that Linus Torvalds possessed time travel technology. Either
way, to say that Linux, OSX and the Windows kernel are the same but with
miniscule differences is a pretty broad statement.
On 8 Jul 2013 13:06, "Bennie Kloosteman" wrote:
> "You think Linux is not well-engineered?"
>
> N
"You think Linux is not well-engineered?"
Nope .. its the same piece of 1970s crap that all the other popular OS use
, with trivial differences people make a bit deal about.. You really think
the difference between Vista and Linux is the kernel when you complain
about X.org ? XP ,Vista , Windows
I should have asked earlier, but better late than never: this
conversation's gone off the rails and well into the "non-courteous,
non-productive" territory we ask people to keep off our lists. See
"Conduct" here:
https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Note-development-policy
We're going to supp
You think Linux is not well-engineered? That statement just took the wind
out of your sails. There are components that run *on top of *Linux (and
similar Unix-like systems) that are poorly engineered, X.org chief among
them, but that doesn't make the Linux kernel poorly engineered. Making
intangibl
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:01 PM, james wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 23:05, Daniel Micay wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:43 PM, james wrote:
>
>> On 05/07/2013 08:37, Graydon Hoare wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I agree that it's higher than it seems it "needs to be". But it will
>>> always be unnecessary overhead
On 05/07/2013 23:05, Daniel Micay wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:43 PM, james wrote:
>On 05/07/2013 08:37, Graydon Hoare wrote:
>>
>>I agree that it's higher than it seems it "needs to be". But it will
>>always be unnecessary overhead on x64; it really makes no sense there. The
>>address spac
On 07/07/2013 02:45 PM, Graydon Hoare wrote:
> There is a specific rule in the C++ specification to address
> temporaries: they should live up until the end of the full expression
> they are part of.
If it is difficult to get that working right, would it be easier if they
lived to the end of the b
On 13-07-07 03:48 AM, Matthieu Monrocq wrote:
There is a specific rule in the C++ specification to address
temporaries: they should live up until the end of the full expression
they are part of.
Yeah. We need to nail this down, it's been open for a while, is on
milestone #1:
https://github.
On 2013.07.06 22:21:44 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> The problem is that in 0.7 almost all #[inline(always)] attributes got
> replaced by just #[inline]. In your code, this causes the write and
> result function for hashing not to be inlined. On its own, this is not a
> problem, but unfortunatel
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Tommy M. McGuire wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 09:53 PM, Ashish Myles wrote:
> > hello.rs:4:8: 4:33 error: borrowed value does not live long enough
>
> I was just about to write asking about this. I discovered it with the
> following code:
>
> for sorted_keys(dict).iter
16 matches
Mail list logo
