Perhaps relevant: Cap'n Proto's RPC protocol
http://kentonv.github.io/capnproto/rpc.html aims to be a cross-language
distributed-object-capability system, and I have been working on a Rust
implementation https://github.com/dwrensha/capnproto-rust.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Rob Meijer
Hi everyone.
I wrote up some of my latest experiences implementing Cap'n Proto encoding
for Rust.
A performance comparison to C++, or capnproto-rust is pretty fast:
http://dwrensha.github.io/capnproto-rust/2013/11/16/benchmark.html
A discussion of safety, or why I'm so keen to see support for
The asReader() methods are also doing more work than necessary. To address
that, I think I'll first need to get the lifetime parameter situation
sorted out.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Huon Wilson dbau...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/11/13 06:30, David Renshaw wrote:
Hi everyone.
I wrote
If I add an unused parameter of type Option'self () to the walk()
method, I can get your example to compile:
https://gist.github.com/dwrensha/29ed998566e2f9218c18
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Vladimir Matveev
dpx.infin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
The problem I'm writing about in this
If I drop the unused parameter, I get an internal compiler error:
'assertion failed: self.variance.is_some()'
___
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
Hello,
I have been thinking about how to fix issue 7331
(https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/7331), because I think that
something like the `Constructable` trait is going to be important for
capnproto-rust (https://github.com/dwrensha/capnproto-rust).
I've managed to find a one-line change
Hi,
When I try to compile the below program, why do I get a conflicting
implementations error? I do not define any implementations of Bar, so
the parameterized impl of Foo should never get instantiated, right?
---
trait Foo {
fn foo() - Self;
}
trait Bar : std::num::Zero {
(self_r=None,
self_ty=Some(BUG[0]), tps=[])
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Niko Matsakis n...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:44:24PM -0400, David Renshaw wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm playing around with a Rust implementation for Cap'n Proto. Check
it out: http://github.com/dwrensha
Hello everyone,
I'm playing around with a Rust implementation for Cap'n Proto. Check
it out: http://github.com/dwrensha/capnproto-rust . I welcome any
comments or contributions.
The reason I'm sharing this project with you now is I'd like to ask
about a language feature missing from Rust that I
Thanks. For the sake of completeness, here is the fixed version:
test-crate.rc
mod file1;
mod file2;
fn main() {
file1::bar();
}
-- file1.rs
use file2::HasInt;
struct X {
x : int
}
impl HasInt for X {
fn foo(self) - int {
self.x
}
}
pub fn
Hello,
I have a question that may be related to Ashish's recent questions.
I was trying to compile the below files and I discovered, unexpectedly,
that one fix is to add the line use file1::file2::*; at the top of
test-crate.rc.
Can someone clarify what's going on here? Is there a fix that
11 matches
Mail list logo
