Thank you.
My problem is more complex than the example I gave. Your answer help me
in reorganizing my code. I use a lib that as generic method that why I
put generic in the example. I remove them and change the way I pass
parameters. I didn't solve everything but I think I'm progressing.
If I
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Ashish Myles wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Philippe Delrieu > wrote:
>
>> pub trait Base {
>> fn do_base(&self);
>> }
>>
>> struct TestBase;
>>
>> impl Base for TestBase{
>> fn do_base(&self){
>> println!("ici");
>> }
>> }
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Philippe Delrieu
wrote:
> pub trait Base {
> fn do_base(&self);
> }
>
> struct TestBase;
>
> impl Base for TestBase{
> fn do_base(&self){
> println!("ici");
> }
> }
>
> trait GenerciFn{
> fn do_generic(&self, base: &T);
> }
>
> st
Hello,
I can't find a solution to a polymorphic problem. I construct a system
to compute a value but I want it to be generic so it doesn't have to
know on what type it computes.
So I use generic and it works fine. Now the system store the object on
what it computes in a collection ([]). The obj
