On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Ashish Myles marci...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, John Clements
cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Paul Stansifer wrote:
Rust syntax expects a literal number in the `[T * n]` construct; from the
parser's
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, John Clements
cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Paul Stansifer wrote:
Rust syntax expects a literal number in the `[T * n]` construct; from the
parser's point of view, what it receives is an expression, without any
Rust syntax expects a literal number in the `[T * n]` construct; from the
parser's point of view, what it receives is an expression, without any
information that it is a number. (There are internal reasons for this, but
it also makes the behavior of `$` more consistent; for example, preventing
