Hello!
@Clark: I must've hit reply instead of reply-all, thanks for re-adding
rust-dev.
I'm not sure I agree about the fail! thing. I think crashing a task on an
unexpected condition is easier to code and to reason about. It forces me to
think about recovery and atomicity. Also even if I structure
On 27/03/14 10:43 AM, Clark Gaebel wrote:
>
> That's interesting. You're kinda looking for exception handling in rust!
> Unfortunately the language seems pretty principled in its opinion that
> failure should be handled at the task boundary exclusively, and this is
> a pretty heavyweight opinion.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Clark Gaebel wrote:
> aside: Your last message didn't get CC'd to rust-dev. I've re-added them,
> and hope dearly I haven't committed a social faux pas.
>
> That's interesting. You're kinda looking for exception handling in rust!
> Unfortunately the language seems
aside: Your last message didn't get CC'd to rust-dev. I've re-added them,
and hope dearly I haven't committed a social faux pas.
That's interesting. You're kinda looking for exception handling in rust!
Unfortunately the language seems pretty principled in its opinion that
failure should be handled
Sorry, was on my phone. Hopefully some sample code will better illustrate
what I'm thinking:
loop {
let result : Result = task::try(proc() {
loop {
recv_msg(); // begin latency sensitive part
process_msg();
send_msg (); // end latency sensitive part
}
});
if result
The "main loop" of your latency sensitive application.
On Mar 26, 2014 5:56 PM, "Phil Dawes" wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Clark Gaebel wrote:
>
>> Can't you put that outside your inner loop?
>>
>
> Sorry Clark, you've lost me. Which inner loop?
>
> ___
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Clark Gaebel wrote:
> Can't you put that outside your inner loop?
>
Sorry Clark, you've lost me. Which inner loop?
___
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
Can't you put that outside your inner loop?
On Mar 26, 2014 5:15 PM, "Phil Dawes" wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I'm interested in using rust for latency sensitive applications. What's
> the cheapest way to achieve isolation in a native rt environment?
>
> I'd like to do something like:
>
> let res
Hello everyone!
I'm interested in using rust for latency sensitive applications. What's the
cheapest way to achieve isolation in a native rt environment?
I'd like to do something like:
let result: Result = task::try(proc() {
... potentually failing code ...
});
but as cheaply as possible an
