It's good to see the rust-dev list still alive! ;)
D.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Flavius Aspra flavius...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with the fact that, while the explanations in the tutorial are fine,
they're way out of order. Even an experienced programmer needs time to
digest the
I agree with the fact that, while the explanations in the tutorial are
fine, they're way out of order. Even an experienced programmer needs time
to digest the material in its entirety.
Rust would make a really good first-to-learn-language, unfortunately that
material is not available yet.
On
Hi Wesley!
That's a very cool analysis. This sounds very much like my thoughts about
the tutorial.
I think you'd better post it on http://users.rust-lang.org/, since it is
the main place for Rust discussions now. The mailing list is almost dead.
--
Oleg
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 4:23 PM Wesley W.
Yes, I discovered this, thanks.
I signed up for http://internals.rust-lang.org/c/documentation and
posted it there.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Oleg Eterevsky o...@eterevsky.com wrote:
Hi Wesley!
That's a very cool analysis. This sounds very much like my thoughts about
the tutorial.
I
Good afternoon and happy easter,
I am a newcomer to Rust and recently finished working through your
tutorial. Before I get too much further into reading the standard
library, I wanted to share my experience as a complete Rust newbie
starting out only with your documentation, before I forget it. I
Thanks Wesley, for your writeup. I’m still learning Rust, and I think your post
here is likely to give me some direction as I learn about some of the unique
features of Rust.
On Apr 6, 2015, at 8:55 AM, Wesley W. Terpstra wes...@terpstra.ca wrote:
Yes, I discovered this, thanks.
I signed
