It might be good to revisit proc syntax, but I don't think that it's yet
time for that. There's a nebulous plan in the works involving
reimplementing closures as traits (or... something?) and how that shakes
out would likely impact the syntax that we want to provide.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:26
Hello rust-dev,
I imagine there are reasons I've not considered for why proc
declaration syntax is the way it is, but I couldn't find any
discussion on this list or in the issues so thought I'd make a
proposal.
I think it would be nice if procs and closures had a more similar syntax.
Specifically
