On 08/29/2012 11:35 AM, Emmanuel Surleau wrote:
[snip]
Given a lot of assumptions about what might ultimately be available
in the language, this looks like the beginnings of a workable
design. Unfortunately, given the stateful nature of a test suite,
you aren't going to be able to run the
Aside from the reflective aspects of JUnit, I think that the closest
analogue in Rust to the use of inheritance to provide overridable
methods like setup() and teardown() would be default methods in traits.
Something like:
trait TestSuite {
fn setup() {}
fn teardown() {}
}
struct
On 08/26/2012 06:33 PM, Steve Jenson wrote:
Hi rustics,
I spent some time this weekend going over the rust tutorial and
documentation for 0.3.1. I thought a fun exercise would be writing an
xUnit testing framework[1] in a classic OO style. I ran into a few
problems:
I'm glad you've been
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Steve Jenson ste...@fruitless.org wrote:
Hi rustics,
I spent some time this weekend going over the rust tutorial and
documentation for 0.3.1. I thought a fun exercise would be writing an
xUnit testing framework[1] in a classic OO style. I ran into a few
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Tim Chevalier catamorph...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Steve Jenson ste...@fruitless.org wrote:
Hi rustics,
I spent some time this weekend going over the rust tutorial and
documentation for 0.3.1. I thought a fun exercise would be writing
