Oh, actually, I wonder if the transfer semantics of ArrayBuffers wouldn't
give us the ability to emulate the exchange heap more accurately:
http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/#9.2
http://updates.html5rocks.com/2011/12/Transferable-Objects-Lightning-Fast
Long story
On 7/18/12 9:48 PM, David Herman wrote:
That would result in a very different performance model, since Rust expects to
be able to create several metric craptons [1] of concurrent tasks, whereas the
number of workers you can create is much smaller. But who knows, it might still
be interesting
On 12 Jul 2012, at 1:40, Mic wrote:
Hello,
Any plans to allow rust to compile to JavaScript like dart
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxogQGnMA9Y .
I'd rather see a pluggable js/lisp/lua/.. interpreter that is able to
handle arbitrary rust values once the reflection api matures to have a
Le 12/07/2012 01:40, Mic a écrit :
Hello,
Any plans to allow rust to compile to JavaScript like dart
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxogQGnMA9Y .
To the best of my knowledge, Rust compiles down to LLVM and Emscripten
compiles from LLVM to JS, so it seems like the hardest part of the job
is
On 7/12/12 12:32 AM, David Bruant wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, Rust compiles down to LLVM and Emscripten
compiles from LLVM to JS, so it seems like the hardest part of the job
is already done.
Maybe so, but there remains a good bit of work. Emscripten requires
non-trivial libraries
Hello,
Any plans to allow rust to compile to JavaScript like dart
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxogQGnMA9Y .
Cheers,
Mic
___
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
