To whom it may concern,
First of all, I have to apologize for sending email again and again. I
notice that my email context is so much that hard to display in a
email. Thus, I delete the patch information.
You can review the code in attached file. Sorry again for bothering you.
This is a Ryu App
To whom it may concern,
First of all, I have to apologize for sending email again and again. I notice
that my email context is so much that hard to display in a email. Thus, I
delete the patch information.
You can review the code in attached file. Sorry again for bothering you.
This is a R
Hi,
On 2016年06月27日 14:36, tanvir.ulhu...@data61.csiro.au wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> I have three questions.
>
>
> Question 1: I want to add a data flow in a specific switch among available
> switches in the network.
>
>
> I have used the following code with that intention that it will add a data
> flow
Hi,
According to OpenFlow Spec 1.5, you need to know which table is the first
egress table, first.
If your switch supports egress table, you can check the capabilities for the
egress table
by OFPTableFeaturesStatsReply messages.
OFPTFF_FIRST_EGRESS capability flag indicates the first egress tabl
To test VLAN_PCP, we must set matcing VLAN_VID.
Table miss test was testing VLAN_VID instead of VLAN_PCP,
because the packet had mismatching VLAN_VID.
---
ryu/tests/switch/of13/match/07_VLAN_PCP.json | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ryu/tests/switch/of13/ma
Thank you for the response Iwase,
Originally my protocol did not reserve any tcp ports. However, in order to
test your solution, I added TCP ports with unique values to the protocol,
and implemented your changes.
Unfortunately, the result is the same (albeit with additional fields):
'\xad\x9c\xd
Hi,
Are you looking for any of the following software users contact information
for your email campaigns or marketing purposes?
* ERP-JD Edwards, Infor Baan, SAP, Exact Software, Net Suite,
PeopleSoft, etc.
* CRM-Salesforce, MS Dynamics, Net Suite, Siebel, TeraData, Epicor,
Thanks everyone.
I realize that what I should actually be doing is modifying the existing
openflow protocols with additional fields, not defining new protocols.
Sorry for the confusion and thanks again for taking the time to help. I
will create a new thread if I run into new problems in that appr
Hi, Tanvir
NXM_NX_PKT_MARK is heavily dependent on Linux kernel packet processing.
And it is not the matter of ryu itself, I'll show an example only
with Open vSwitch.
It was very hard for me to examine the actual working case, but
I found following seems working:
- setup Open vSwitch and veth,
Hi Kawai-San,
Thank you for your nice patch!
On 2016年07月06日 20:06, Kawai, Hiroaki wrote:
> To test VLAN_PCP, we must set matcing VLAN_VID.
> Table miss test was testing VLAN_VID instead of VLAN_PCP,
> because the packet had mismatching VLAN_VID.
Additionally, how about setting vlan_vid=(OFPVID_
Currently, there is NXAction that is not supported by Ryu.
The following patches add NXActions that is not supported by Ryu,
and Update the parameter of Some NxAction.
Additionally, add test cases and documents are updated.
Shinpei Muraoka (9):
ofproto/nx_actions: Add NXAction used only in Open
Signed-off-by: Shinpei Muraoka
---
ryu/ofproto/nx_actions.py | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ryu/ofproto/nx_actions.py b/ryu/ofproto/nx_actions.py
index 74ca14a..cabbe3b 100644
--- a/ryu/ofproto/nx_actions.py
+++ b/ryu/ofproto/nx_actions.py
@@ -608,7 +6
This patch, update the methods that are to be specified in the NXM or OXM.
Update the oxm_types specified in the bit format to the string.
Update the following NXAction.
- NXActionOutputReg
- NXActionMultipath
- NXActionBundle
- NXActionBundleLoad
Signed-off-by: Shinpei Muraoka
---
ryu/ofpr
Signed-off-by: Shinpei Muraoka
---
doc/source/nicira_ext_ref.rst | 42 +-
ryu/ofproto/nx_actions.py | 1242 +
2 files changed, 1280 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/source/nicira_ext_ref.rst b/doc/source/nicira_ext_ref.rst
index 562e12a
Actions to be added are as following.
- NXActionDecTtlCntIds
- NXActionStackPush
- NXActionStackPop
- NXActionSample
- NXActionOutputReg2
- NXActionRegLoad2
- NXActionController2
Signed-off-by: Shinpei Muraoka
---
ryu/ofproto/nicira_ext.py | 14 ++
ryu/ofproto/nx_actions.py | 474 +++
Note: The following actions are not implemented yet,
because ovs-ofctl command is not supported.
- NXActionRegLoad2
- NXActionOutputReg2
Signed-off-by: Shinpei Muraoka
---
.../of13/ovs-ofctl-of13-action_controller2.packet | Bin 0 -> 128 bytes
.../ovs-ofctl-of13-action_dec_ttl_cnt_ids.packet
Actions to be added are as following.
- NXActionSample2
- NXActionOutputTrunc
Signed-off-by: Shinpei Muraoka
---
doc/source/nicira_ext_ref.rst | 2 +
ryu/ofproto/nicira_ext.py | 2 +
ryu/ofproto/nx_actions.py | 138 ++
3 files changed, 142 in
There is NXAction to be used only in OpenFlow1.0.
These actions are supported by default in OpenFlow1.2 or later.
Therefore, it becomes unnecessary as the NXAction.
But, to add the NXAction in order to be able to use in OpenFlow1.0.
Actions to be added are as following.
- NXActionSetQueue
- NXAct
Signed-off-by: Shinpei Muraoka
---
.../of10/ovs-ofctl-of10-action_dec_mpls_ttl.packet | Bin 0 -> 88 bytes
.../of10/ovs-ofctl-of10-action_dec_nw_ttl.packet | Bin 0 -> 88 bytes
.../of10/ovs-ofctl-of10-action_pop_mpls.packet | Bin 0 -> 88 bytes
.../of10/ovs-ofctl-of10-action_push_mpls.packe
Signed-off-by: Shinpei Muraoka
---
.../of13/ovs-ofctl-of13-action_output_trunc.packet | Bin 0 -> 80 bytes
.../of13/ovs-ofctl-of13-action_sample2.packet | Bin 0 -> 96 bytes
ryu/tests/packet_data_generator3/gen.py| 12 ++
.../ovs-ofctl-of13-action_output_trunc.packet.json |
To test VLAN_PCP, VLAN_VID must match.
Table miss test was testing VLAN_VID instead of VLAN_PCP,
because the packet had mismatching VLAN_VID.
Fixes to set only OFPVID_PRESENT bit in the match field.
---
ryu/tests/switch/of13/match/07_VLAN_PCP.json | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Hi Kawai-San,
Thank you for updating your patch!
It looks good to me.
Thanks,
Iwase
On 2016年07月07日 12:01, Kawai, Hiroaki wrote:
> To test VLAN_PCP, VLAN_VID must match.
> Table miss test was testing VLAN_VID instead of VLAN_PCP,
> because the packet had mismatching VLAN_VID.
> Fixes to set onl
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:57 AM, 谢磊 wrote:
>when i used ovsdb protocol integrated into ryu, i met a problem like
> this:
>first, i set manager for ovs like this: ovs-vsctl set-manager
> tcp:ip:port
>second, i write a very simple app in which a handler function handle
> NewOV
Signed-off-by: Jason Kölker
---
ryu/lib/ofctl_nicira_ext.py | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ryu/lib/ofctl_nicira_ext.py b/ryu/lib/ofctl_nicira_ext.py
index 3a5c6be..fd77369 100644
--- a/ryu/lib/ofctl_nicira_ext.py
+++ b/ryu/lib/ofctl_nicira_ext.py
@@ -
thank you for your quick reply
i use tcpdump in both controller and ovs, and the result is:
1. controller can send ls_dbs method and receive reply from ovs, then send
get_schema method but no reply
2. when ovs receive get_schema from controller, it quickly react and send
the schema of Open_vSwitch,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:19 AM, 谢磊 wrote:
> thank you for your quick reply
> i use tcpdump in both controller and ovs, and the result is:
> 1. controller can send ls_dbs method and receive reply from ovs, then send
> get_schema method but no reply
> 2. when ovs receive get_schema from controller,
this change broke dragonflow.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dragonflow/+bug/1599367
i thought we aimed to align with on-wire fields rather than ovs-ofctl etc.
was the policy changed?
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Shinpei Muraoka
wrote:
> This patch, update the methods that are to be specified in
27 matches
Mail list logo
