A quick patch to clean up stale Datapath objects in the ofctl_service
application.
Signed-off-by: Victor J. Orlikowski
---
diff --git a/ryu/app/ofctl/service.py b/ryu/app/ofctl/service.py
index 0ca00c7..19aebd4 100644
--- a/ryu/app/ofctl/service.py
+++ b/ryu/app/ofctl/service.py
@@ -79,6 +79,8
When a Datapath disconnects, an application may not know about it until it
attempts to send a message to that Datapath.
Ryu's core will detect the failure to send, and will close the Datapath object
- but has no way of letting the application know that it did so.
With this patch, send_msg() retu
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:06:10 +0900
Shinpei Muraoka wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Shinpei Muraoka
> ---
> doc/source/library_packet_ref.rst | 3 +
> ryu/lib/packet/gre.py | 129
> ++
> ryu/lib/packet/in_proto.py| 1 +
> ryu/lib/packet/ipv4.p
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:35:54 +0900
Shinpei Muraoka wrote:
> Also, the results of discussions with Fujita-san and Iwamoto-San,
> the type of argument zone_src of NXActionCT was changed to a string.
> Fix to work even if you specify a number in the NXActionCT of argument
> zone_src.
>
> Argument
Hi Iwase,
Thanks so much for your response. I want to modify the requests/responses that
are sent to Ryu ofctl_rest, therefore I'm building another application (called
my app). This app can provide similar APIs as Ryu ofctl_rest app.However, I
don't want other applications to communicate direct
Mystery solved, needed a priority of 0. Don't know why. Switch is HPE Comware, btw. Word to the wise. On 07/27/16, Scott Reeve wrote: Trying to have all go from Table 0 to Table 1.This:RYUseems to indicate a null match criteria "{}" but it doesn't work.Here's my code: curl -X POST -d '{ "d
Hi
I tried to use the following code to add a data flow which has two specific
actions operations: OFPActionSetField, and OFPActionOutput.
match = parser.OFPMatch(eth_src='00:00:00:00:00:04',
eth_dst='00:00:00:00:00:07')
actions =
[parser.OFPActionSetField(parser.OFPMatchField.make(ofproto
Hi Maurizio,
Il 27/07/2016 21:36, Maurizio Marrocco ha scritto:
> Hi, RYU team.
>
> I'm Sorry for those questions, but I have a doubt about Match procedure in
> Openflow.
>
> In the flow table, the matching is done on OpenFlow PDU (i.e. PACKET OUT) or
> PDU transported by Openflow?
>
> For examp