[Ryu-devel] ONUG Grand Challenge Hackathon

2016-02-25 Thread Srini Seetharaman
ONUG community is soliciting entries for the ONUG Grand Challenge , which is a virtual hackathon to be featured in the Spring 2016 conference. The competition targets developers from across the g

Re: [Ryu-devel] Error[98] address already in use.

2014-09-13 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Hi, I built the starter-kit VM. In that, there is already an instance of Ryu kicked off as root during bootup. So, you should first kill that. On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:21 PM, nitish nagesh wrote: > Hi Kiran, > >It generally means there is another application using the port (6633). > This is

Re: [Ryu-devel] Patch to ignore LLDP packets in simple_switch

2014-07-31 Thread Srini Seetharaman
wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:39:43 -0700 > Srini Seetharaman wrote: > > > From 086bf44986ce82e9afbf1504c0a0c76bfbb0fd5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Srini Seetharaman > > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:35:13 -0700 > > Subject: [PATCH] Up

Re: [Ryu-devel] Ryu-based SDN starter kit release

2014-07-02 Thread Srini Seetharaman
14 at 7:25 AM, Nicholas Bastin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Srini Seetharaman > wrote: >> >> > * ofctl_rest thinks that DPIDs are base-10 integers (instead of >> > base-16), >> > and is very unhappy when they are not - I'm not sure whethe

Re: [Ryu-devel] Ryu-based SDN starter kit release

2014-06-30 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Hi Nick Thanks for the quick feedback. > * ofctl_rest thinks that DPIDs are base-10 integers (instead of base-16), > and is very unhappy when they are not - I'm not sure whether this is a > problem with how the sdn-starter-kit apps use ofctl_rest, or a more > pervasive problem in general Can you

[Ryu-devel] Ryu-based SDN starter kit release

2014-06-27 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Hi all: SDN Hub is releasing a SDN starter kit based on the Ryu platform to promote SDN trial and adoption in smaller proof-of-concept deployments. We provide a package of simple applications / modules like topology visualization, monitoring/tap management, server load-balancing to allow users to g

[Ryu-devel] Patch to ignore LLDP packets in simple_switch

2014-06-25 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Hi all: I noticed a problem with topology discovery when used in combination with the simple_switch_13. It may be best for the packet_in handler of simple_switch to ignore LLDP packets. I made a patch like the one attached for myself. I'm submitting it in case you find it reasonable to push upstre

[Ryu-devel] Patch to resolve exception in get_desc_stats

2014-06-25 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Hi all: Attached is a simple patch that solves an exception that I faced when the get_desc_stats() call was made even before some switch descriptions were archived. Hope you can accept it. Thanks Srini. 0001-Initializing-the-variable-s-so-that-the-get_desc_sta.patch Description: Binary data

[Ryu-devel] Setting highest priority to rule matching LLDP packets

2014-01-05 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Attached is a patch to set the highest priority to rule for topology discovery. This avoids any interference from other overlapping port-based rules. 0001-Setting-highest-rule-priority-to-LLDP-packets-in-top.patch Description: Binary data --

Re: [Ryu-devel] match_append incorrect in to_match

2013-12-21 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Here is the git format-patch after passing run_tests and fixing the pep8 warning. On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:31 AM, FUJITA Tomonori < fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:54:44 -0800 > Srini Seetharaman wrote: > > > I noticed in the functio

[Ryu-devel] match_append incorrect in to_match

2013-12-20 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Hi, I noticed in the function to_match in ryu/lib/ofctl_v1_3.py that there is an incorrect match_append statement. I've attached a patch to fix that. The patch also includes setting the default priority for the rules in ofproto_v1_3 and ofproto_v1_3_parser. I think this is missing. Thanks Srini.

Re: [Ryu-devel] Patch for supporting topo discovery in OF1.3

2013-12-17 Thread Srini Seetharaman
15 Dec 2013 23:16:29 -0800 > Srini Seetharaman wrote: > > > Here is a patch for extending the support of topology discovery (provided > > by ryu/topology/switches.py) to OF1.3. Please review and push to the main > > branch if acceptable. > > > > I've only te

[Ryu-devel] Patch for supporting topo discovery in OF1.3

2013-12-15 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Hi all: Here is a patch for extending the support of topology discovery (provided by ryu/topology/switches.py) to OF1.3. Please review and push to the main branch if acceptable. I've only tested with mininet + OVS 1.10 + OF 1.3. Thanks Srini. lldp_v1_3.patch Description: Binary data ---

Re: [Ryu-devel] ArgsAlreadyParsedError in Ryu-manager ver 3.4

2013-12-12 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Ah, ok. That works. Thanks Yamamoto-san. On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:53 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > Hi > > I did a git clone of Ryu today (Ryu-manager version 3.4). When I ran the > > manager with ryu/topology/switches and ryu/topology/dumper, I got the > > ArgsAlreadyParsedError error. I read

[Ryu-devel] ArgsAlreadyParsedError in Ryu-manager ver 3.4

2013-12-12 Thread Srini Seetharaman
Hi I did a git clone of Ryu today (Ryu-manager version 3.4). When I ran the manager with ryu/topology/switches and ryu/topology/dumper, I got the ArgsAlreadyParsedError error. I read on the archive that it was fixed previously. But, looks like there's some issue now. ubuntu@ubuntu:~/ryu$ ./bin/ryu