Hi,
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 17:48:07 +0800
Alex Tang wrote:
> Great! but it seems that some results are beyond my expectations. Could you
> please provide the configurations and firmware version of these switches?
FYI, we added more results of various hardware switches with its
configuration and fi
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 17:48:07 +0800
Alex Tang wrote:
> Great! but it seems that some results are beyond my expectations. Could you
> please provide the configurations and firmware version of these switches?
Surely, such info will be available at the site soon.
> By the way, for PUSH_VLAN te
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 08:46:43 +0900 (JST)
yamam...@valinux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Our results of OpenFlow switch testings became public. You can check
>> out what kinds of actions and matches a switch supports (or not):
>>
>> http://osrg.github.io/ryu/certification.html
>
>
Hello,
Great! but it seems that some results are beyond my expectations. Could you
please provide the configurations and firmware version of these switches?
By the way, for PUSH_VLAN testing, is it expected to be successful without
additional SET_FIELD to vlan_vid?
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Wei-Li T
> Hi,
>
> Our results of OpenFlow switch testings became public. You can check
> out what kinds of actions and matches a switch supports (or not):
>
> http://osrg.github.io/ryu/certification.html
why is 'total' OK+ERRORS smaller for non-netdev OVS than others?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
>
> The results
Hi,
Our results of OpenFlow switch testings became public. You can check
out what kinds of actions and matches a switch supports (or not):
http://osrg.github.io/ryu/certification.html
The results of hardware switches will be available shortly (next month
or so). The results are updated continous
