[sage-combinat-devel] Sage 4.2 release plan

2009-10-20 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello, Here is the current status of 4.2. All of the prerequisites for the categories code has been merged. I'm going to take care of a few more patches, and then release alpha1. The plan is to do an official release on Thursday. I am willing and able to do a quick Sage 4.3 after with with ca

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Categories restart: the end?

2009-10-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:49:41PM +0200, David R. Kohel wrote: > > Please just edit the wiki page as has been done so far. > > OK, I will do that. I can probably return to this Thursday (tomorrow > I'm busy with teaching). It would be great to be finished with this part by the end of the week

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Categories restart: the end?

2009-10-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 06:08:45PM +0200, David R. Kohel wrote: > Hi Nicolas et al, > > This morning I was looking over the categories code, Cool! > And have some > organizational questions for getting this into sage-4.2. > > I tried the following: > > 1. I downloaded all of the files tagged

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Cython] LiE in Cython

2009-10-20 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello, On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Daniel Bump wrote: > One important thing LiE can so is to compute > Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials. However it is slow and > can't get much past around B3. Coxeter3 is a better > program for this. KL polynomials are quite important > and it should be a prior

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Cython] LiE in Cython

2009-10-20 Thread Daniel Bump
> By the way: what's the status of this spkg? Is there some > documentation somewhere of what can be done with it from Sage? (I just > tried lie-2.2.2.p3 but it does not seem compile on my 32bits i686 > ubuntu box). William Stein has stated that LiE would not be made a standard package because i