On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Florent Hivert wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>>> Dear category fans, dear Sage-Combinat developers,
>>>
>>> This is my final status report for the category patches:
>>>
>>> Yiiippeee!
>>
>> + len(_) :-
Florent Hivert wrote:
> Hi !
>
>> Dear category fans, dear Sage-Combinat developers,
>>
>> This is my final status report for the category patches:
>>
>> Yiiippeee!
>
> + len(_) :-)
From me as well :-) !
Thanks Nicolas for all the hard work on
Hi !
> Dear category fans, dear Sage-Combinat developers,
>
> This is my final status report for the category patches:
>
> Yiiippeee!
+ len(_) :-)
Cheers,
Florent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
Dear category fans, dear Sage-Combinat developers,
This is my final status report for the category patches:
Yiiippeee!
Mike just merged them today in Sage 4.3-alpha0, together with one year
of hard work worth of feature-full patches around root
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:36:25AM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
> Oops, E8(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) has degree 3875. That could be slow.
:-)
> I think I probably meant to branch E8(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1) which
> is the standard representation having degree 248.
That one actually appears right after and takes jus
> I just ran each long test individually, and annotated them with how
> much time they took (on my macbook pro). They are indeed all below
> 30s, except for a big E8 test which takes 160s. I marked that one as
Oops, E8(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) has degree 3875. That could be slow.
I think I probably meant
Hi Daniel!
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:32:25PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
> > The patch #5794 adds a lot of branching rules, and tests are provided
> > for most of these. I marked many of them long.
> >
> > I won't have time immediatel
