Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Categories: final report!

2009-11-20 Thread Martin Rubey
"Nicolas M. Thiery" writes: > Dear category fans, dear Sage-Combinat developers, > > This is my final status report for the category patches: > > Yiiippeee! factorial(Congratulations) I should say to live up to the cliché... Martin -- You recei

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Categories: final report!

2009-11-20 Thread Daniel Bump
> This is my final status report for the category patches: > > Yiiippeee! +1 > Mike just merged them today in Sage 4.3-alpha0, together with one year > of hard work worth of feature-full patches around root systems, Weyl > characters, symmetric

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Categories review: almost there!

2009-11-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 05:04:24AM -0800, bump wrote: > > Dan: maybe the #5794 patches could be partially or completely folded > > together. I am thinking in particular about the cartan_type-temporary* > > patches which can are not temporary after all :-) > > Oops, I had overlooked this message, w

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Categories review: almost there!

2009-11-20 Thread bump
> Dan: maybe the #5794 patches could be partially or completely folded > together. I am thinking in particular about the cartan_type-temporary* > patches which can are not temporary after all :-) Oops, I had overlooked this message, which is now a week old. Since there's been further activity on

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: Where should I write this combinatorics function ?

2009-11-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:29:16AM -0800, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Here it is !! :-) > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7492 Cool, thanks! I would return the result as an element of: CombinatorialFreeModule(Permutations(n), F) where n is the size of the matrix, and F its ground