Dear Mike!
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:18:13AM +0700, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Sage 4.3.rc0 is out. Source and binary are available at
Cool! I can't wait for 4.3!
Oh one thing: since we got hurt by it in 4.2.1: could we add to the
release check list that `sage -combinat install` should work
r
> Would it be natural to use IwahoriHeckeAlgebra(W, q1, q2)?
Maybe this is the best idea.
Dan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe fro
Hi,
> The patch cardinality_of_rauzy_classes-vd.patch which breaks Sage's
Sorry for that. I'm working on the patch trac_7145 from the review of
Sebastien and let the cardinality apart...
Cheers,
Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combina
Hi Vincent!
The patch cardinality_of_rauzy_classes-vd.patch which breaks Sage's
starts up; probably a file that has not been added. I temporarily
disabled it in the queue.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You rec
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 07:11:37AM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
> Yes, http://wiki.sagemath.org/HeckeAlgebras is exactly what we
> need. These are so fundamental that they should be in Sage.
Definitely.
> > I think rewriting from scratch an implementation of the generic Hecke
> > algebra in the T_w
Yes, http://wiki.sagemath.org/HeckeAlgebras
is exactly what we need. These are so fundamental that they should
be in Sage.
> I think rewriting from scratch an implementation of the generic Hecke
> algebra in the T_w basis, with two parameters q1 and q2 would be a
> good starting point. With the c
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 02:22:25PM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
> I am doing some calculations in Iwahori Hecke algebras.
> By this I mean the deformation of the group algebra of
> a Weyl group in which the generators corresponding to
> the simple reflections satisfy t_alpha^2=(q-1)*t_alpha+q,
> where
