Hi!
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:11:47PM +0100, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> sage-combinat is broken on my computer because of
>
> on sage-4.3
>
> {{{
> application de trac_7978_crystal_cleanup-as.patch
> patching file sage/combinat/crystals/crystals.py
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 135
> }}}
Please
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:14:27PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:06:40AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> > Please go ahead. Otherwise I'll look at this later this week.
>
> Ok. I'll do that probably tonight.
Here is the description of affine-E-nt.patch.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:08:49PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> KirillovReshetikhinCrystal only dispenses to the nonconjectural
> implementation KR_type_E6. The equivalent (but conjectural) code
> KR_type_E6_order2 is not referred to elsewhere. Is this acceptable?
That definitely does the job. T
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:06:40AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Please go ahead. Otherwise I'll look at this later this week.
Ok. I'll do that probably tonight.
How can it be private if it is already on the sage-combinat server :-) ?
Well, the sage-combinat server
Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Hi everyone,
sage-combinat is broken on my computer because of
on sage-4.3
{{{
application de trac_7978_crystal_cleanup-as.patch
patching file sage/combinat/crystals/crystals.py
Hunk #2 FAILED at 135
}}}
Sorry, I currently cannot update with sage-4.3, so cannot
comme
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 04:02:17PM -0500, Jason Bandlow wrote:
>> Ok, I tried this, but I'm running into pickling problems with attrcall:
>>
>> sage: f = attrcall("is_one")
>> sage: f == loads(dumps(f))
>> False
>>
>> So I don't know how to implement the approach you sugg
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 04:02:17PM -0500, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Ok, I tried this, but I'm running into pickling problems with attrcall:
>
> sage: f = attrcall("is_one")
> sage: f == loads(dumps(f))
> False
>
> So I don't know how to implement the approach you suggested and wind up
> with somethi
Hi Nicolas,
Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
>>Alternative: handle the upper/lower logic once for all in the
>>constructor by defining an attribute self._leading_term set to
>>attrcall("leading_term", cmp) or attrcall("trailing_term", cmp).
>
> Ooh, that sounds nice.
Hi everyone,
sage-combinat is broken on my computer because of
on sage-4.3
{{{
application de trac_7978_crystal_cleanup-as.patch
patching file sage/combinat/crystals/crystals.py
Hunk #2 FAILED at 135
}}}
and on 4-3-1 at startup
{{{
SyntaxError: Non-ASCII character '\xe2' in file
/usr/local/sag
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:06:40AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Please go ahead. Otherwise I'll look at this later this week.
Ok. I'll do that probably tonight.
> How can it be private if it is already on the sage-combinat server :-) ?
Well, the sage-combinat server is not that trivial to use
Hi Nicolas,
I rebased the later crystal patches and removed the guard.
Currently a lot of tests in combinat/crystals/highest_weight_crystals.py
fail. I need to investigate why this is so (I am sure they passed when I
submitted
the patch a long time ago).
I just had a look. It's just that Cry
11 matches
Mail list logo
