Hi Nicolas,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> It's important for the Sage-Combinat project to have a list of
> publications one way or the other.
Nod.
> How is http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications.html managed? Is
> it built automatically from the bibtex fi
Hi Anne,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Here are a couple more papers that cite or acknowledge sage that
> could be added to the page:
I have updated the publications page [1] with the above three publications.
[1] http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications.html
Hi Jason,
My function also had a typo (since it did not take the
coefficient of the monomial into account). I opened a ticket
trac #8259. I think it would be great if you could integrate
it into sage!!
Best,
Anne
Jason Bandlow wrote:
Oops, small typo. Let me try again:
def toSF(f):
"""
Hi Jason,
Thank you! Actually, following a suggestion from Nicolas, I have now
also written the following (minimally tested) function assuming the
base field is over QQ and assuming the function is symmetric (which
is not tested):
def from_polynomial(f):
exp = [list(x) for x in f.exponents()
Oops, small typo. Let me try again:
def toSF(f):
""" Input is a symmetric polynomial in a polynomial ring in finitely
many variables. Output is a symmetric function in the monomial
basis of the ring of symmetric functions over the same base ring.
"""
X = f.parent().gens()
Hi Anne,
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:53:27AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
>> I would like to write a symmetric polynomial (not function)
>> in terms of one of the usual bases (like Schur polynomials).
> That's a quite basic feature, that we ought to have (that was fromPo
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:53:27AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I would like to write a symmetric polynomial (not function)
> in terms of one of the usual bases (like Schur polynomials).
>
> For example, I would like to write
>
> sage: n=2
> sage: P = PolynomialRing(QQ, 'x', n)
> sage: x=[P.gen
Hi!
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:53:43PM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> > Hi Florent,
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Florent Hivert
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Should we put there our publications with a link from sage's relat
Hello Florent,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 06:09:12PM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> They both are 2 month old (version 4.2 of sage) which is not very good. As far
> as I remember Mike took care or building those. By the way thanks for this. Is
> this true ? If so Mike how did you set-up those
David Joyner wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi Florent,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Florent Hivert
wrote:
Should we put there our publications with a link from sage's related
publications page [3] or put our publication directly there ?
I personally vo
Hi Minh,
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Florent Hivert
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Should we put there our publications with a link from sage's related
> > publications page [3] or put our publication directly there ?
>
> Do you want to maintain two pages of publications? One dedicated to
>
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Florent,
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Florent Hivert
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Should we put there our publications with a link from sage's related
>> publications page [3] or put our publication directly there ?
I personally vote for a
Hi,
I would like to write a symmetric polynomial (not function)
in terms of one of the usual bases (like Schur polynomials).
For example, I would like to write
sage: n=2
sage: P = PolynomialRing(QQ, 'x', n)
sage: x=[P.gen(i) for i in range(n)]
sage: f=sum((x[i] for i in range(n)), P.zero())
sag
Hi Florent,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Should we put there our publications with a link from sage's related
> publications page [3] or put our publication directly there ?
Do you want to maintain two pages of publications? One dedicated to
sage-combinat publicati
Hi there,
There is starting to be a few publications (at least submitted) which used
sage-combinat for research. This is certainly a good idea to show them. In the
Plume-Feather page [1] there is a link to a non-existent page [2] on our wiki.
Should we put there our publications with a link
Hi there,
I'm cleaning a little our wiki page. I noticed the following two links
Sage sources with the Sage-combinat patches applied:
http://combinat.sagemath.org/code/file/tip/sage/
Sage documentation with the Sage-combinat patches applied:
http://combinat.sagemath.org/doc/
T
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:25:30PM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> > I seem that you messed things up with the classcall patches. I have
> > rejections... Did you forget so commit / push ?
>
> As far as I unserstood you folded my patch and forgot to commit its removal. I
> marked it as guarded. Ple
> I seem that you messed things up with the classcall patches. I have
> rejections... Did you forget so commit / push ?
As far as I unserstood you folded my patch and forgot to commit its removal. I
marked it as guarded. Please remove it as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Florent
--
You received thi
Hi Nicolas,
I seem that you messed things up with the classcall patches. I have
rejections... Did you forget so commit / push ?
Florent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combi
19 matches
Mail list logo
