Re: [sage-combinat-devel] The queue is broken !!! trac_8490_square_free-vd.patch

2010-03-11 Thread Vincent Delecroix
I put guards #4_3_4_1 on my patch and everything applies (with or without 4_3_4_1 selected) Sorry for this Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] The queue is broken !!! trac_8490_square_free-vd.patch

2010-03-11 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hi Florent, > application de trac_8490_square_free-vd.patch > unable to find 'sage/combinat/words/finite_word.py' for patching > 1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > sage/combinat/words/finite_word.py.r > l'application du patch a échoué, impossible de continuer (essayez avec -v) >

[sage-combinat-devel] The queue is broken !!! trac_8490_square_free-vd.patch

2010-03-11 Thread Florent Hivert
I've got some rejects: application de trac_8490_square_free-vd.patch unable to find 'sage/combinat/words/finite_word.py' for patching 1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file sage/combinat/words/finite_word.py.r l'application du patch a échoué, impossible de continuer (essayez avec -v) p

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: two operations on partitions

2010-03-11 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hello, One more time with integer partitions... 1) I find the actual __repr__ boring (Ferrers diagram). Why do not keep the old list representations which is really clearer than lines of sharps ? Is there a reason to prefer Ferrer diagrams than list of integers ? Moreover with the actual serie of